Comments on: The week of the outrageous [videos] http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/ News and issues from Colombia, a passionate South American country, by Carlos Raúl van der Weyden Velásquez Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:14:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: j. http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/#comment-20 j. Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:00:08 +0000 http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/#comment-20 About Victor. I believe he should have apologized for promoting that kind of discussion. His post was tendencious and so was the discussion it generated. And then he excused himself claiming it was the way democracy worked. I expected him to at least admit he did wrong making echo to those completely unjustified acussations. The saboteur is not going to apologize. I hope he is identified soon. About Victor. I believe he should have apologized for promoting that kind of discussion. His post was tendencious and so was the discussion it generated. And then he excused himself claiming it was the way democracy worked. I expected him to at least admit he did wrong making echo to those completely unjustified acussations.

The saboteur is not going to apologize. I hope he is identified soon.

]]> By: Carlos Raúl van der Weyden Velásquez http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/#comment-18 Carlos Raúl van der Weyden Velásquez Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:43:11 +0000 http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/#comment-18 j., I really appreciate you've came by this place. You're right about the wrong word I used to describe Ruiz, so I changed it. And thank you for correcting the "lamer" thing. I just have something not clear yet: when you say "it's a shame he didn't even apologize for it", are you talking about the lamer or about Víctor? j., I really appreciate you’ve came by this place. You’re right about the wrong word I used to describe Ruiz, so I changed it. And thank you for correcting the “lamer” thing.

I just have something not clear yet: when you say “it’s a shame he didn’t even apologize for it”, are you talking about the lamer or about Víctor?

]]> By: j. http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/#comment-16 j. Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:37:23 +0000 http://colombiaherald.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/the-week-of-the-outrageous-videos/#comment-16 I don't quite understand why you linked me under the word "hideous". What do I have to do with that? I hope you're not suggesting that I'm acussing Ruiz of being such a thing. I'm guessing that's not the word you're looking for. I also wanted to point out that the flaw of Solano's post, and what makes it almost irresponsible, was believing that there was anything constructive at all in opening a debate about the guilt of Ruiz as if we were supposed to democratically decide who was behind the attacks. Doing what he did, he only made the already tense situation even worse. That exchange of accusations was unnecessary and silly. Nobody, except perhaps the lamer, won anything from it. It's a shame he didn't even apologize for it. (Oh, and, by the way, it is "lamer", not "lammer". Just a single "m". It comes from "lame", which is an accurate description of the king of things that they do.) I don’t quite understand why you linked me under the word “hideous”. What do I have to do with that? I hope you’re not suggesting that I’m acussing Ruiz of being such a thing. I’m guessing that’s not the word you’re looking for.

I also wanted to point out that the flaw of Solano’s post, and what makes it almost irresponsible, was believing that there was anything constructive at all in opening a debate about the guilt of Ruiz as if we were supposed to democratically decide who was behind the attacks. Doing what he did, he only made the already tense situation even worse. That exchange of accusations was unnecessary and silly. Nobody, except perhaps the lamer, won anything from it. It’s a shame he didn’t even apologize for it.

(Oh, and, by the way, it is “lamer”, not “lammer”. Just a single “m”. It comes from “lame”, which is an accurate description of the king of things that they do.)

]]>